Mississippi enjoys some of the most affordable, reliable power in America — one of our greatest
economic assets. See what that advantage is worth to you today, and what it would cost to lose it to California-style mandates.
Tell us about your home
Mississippi todaySubsidized mandates
Flip the switch to layer subsidized-supply mandates onto your bill
Subsidized supply, ratepayer subsidies, program fees, and the cost of forcing out reliable power — whatever the source
Your estimated electricity bill in Mississippi
$0
about $0 a year
Your Mississippi bill across the year — tap a month
What's in your bill today?
In Mississippi, almost every dollar on your electric bill buys
actual electricity — generation and delivery. There's no subsidy scheme forcing politically-favored power onto the grid,
and no stack of program surcharges riding along. That's the difference between a state that lets the
market deliver power and one that legislates it. Here's roughly how your July bill splits.
Policy and surcharges add up to just
$0 a year
of your bill — a fraction of what high-mandate states pile on.
Mississippi vs. the high-cost states
The bottom line. If your home drew the same power under
California's energy prices, you'd pay
$0 more a month
— that's $0 a year out of your pocket. Mississippi's low, reliable rates are a
direct result of not following their playbook.
Mississippi vs. the rest of America
-0%
below the U.S. average
18.8¢
U.S. average / kWh
16.8¢
Mississippi / kWh
2.1×
what California charges
Average residential price — Mississippi vs. U.S. average
Mississippi has stayed below the national average every
single year — and that advantage is one of our greatest economic assets, pulling jobs and investment here.
As national demand surges and other states push their prices higher, keeping our power cheap and reliable takes the right
policy choices. The gap is the advantage — and the goal is to maintain it.
The road to higher bills
High-cost states didn't get expensive by accident. They legislated
it — subsidies, mandates, and forced retirements of reliable plants, each one added to the
bill. Here's what the same monthly bill looks like as you travel that road:
Why it matters. Every step away from market-based, reliable power is a step toward the bills
families pay in California and the Northeast. Mississippi's advantage isn't luck — it's policy restraint,
and it can be legislated away one subsidy at a time.
Adopting a full subsidized-supply mandate stack could cost a typical
household $0 a year.
Cheap power is how Mississippi wins
Data centers, factories and manufacturers shop for one thing above all:
abundant, affordable, reliable electricity. PJM-region states in the Northeast are watching prices soar as
demand outruns mandate-constrained supply. Mississippi can win that investment — if it protects what makes it
attractive.
Follow the subsidy playbook
Your bill
Jobs
Pile on subsidies and mandates, force out reliable plants, and Mississippi's rates climb
toward the high-cost states — while the energy-hungry employers it could have attracted go elsewhere.
Protect the advantage
Your bill
Jobs
Keep power cheap and reliable, welcome new generation, and let the market build supply to meet demand.
Low bills stay low and Mississippi lands the data centers, factories and jobs that need them.
The principle is simple: affordable, reliable energy
is an economic asset. The fastest way to throw it away is to copy the policies of the states families are
leaving.
The data-center boom — welcome it without raising your bill
AI and data centers are driving the fastest jump in power demand in decades — U.S. data-center use was about 4% of all electricity in 2024 and is expected to more than double by 2030 (IEA). Mississippi is already winning that investment: Amazon alone is putting up to $25 billion into data centers across the state. The real question is who pays for the new power — Entergy Mississippi is building an estimated $2–3 billion of new generation to serve them.
Socialize the cost
The regulated utility builds the new plants and lines for the data centers, then spreads the cost — and the risk of stranded assets — across every ratepayer. Your household bill rises to power someone else's server farm. It's how Georgia's families ended up paying for Plant Vogtle.
Let it pay its own way
A private producer serves the data center under contract — on its own grid, separate from the public system, carrying its own cost and risk. Mississippi still lands the investment, and your bill is untouched.
The same principle, twice. Whether it's a subsidy scheme or a data-center build-out, the free-market answer is the same: don't socialize the cost — let new supply stand on its own. Opening the door to private, consumer-regulated producers lets Mississippi welcome the boom without loading it onto households.
Policy idea: “Consumer-Regulated Electricity” — see the Cato Institute briefing paper (Fisher & Lyons) and the ALEC model bill.
My Mississippi energy advantage
$0
a year is what Mississippi's low, reliable power saves me versus California.
Mississippi runs mostly on natural gas (74%) and nuclear (15%) — abundant, dependable,
always-on power. There's no mandate dictating which sources utilities must use, so they build what keeps the
lights on at the lowest cost. The result is on your bill.
How does that compare to the high-cost states?
Same home, same power use — here's each state's price.
The expensive states didn't run out of cheap options; they legislated against them.
Why Mississippi stays affordable
No subsidy schemes. Mississippi doesn't prop up favored suppliers or force utilities to hit politically-set
targets, so it avoids the surcharges and stranded-asset costs that inflate bills elsewhere.
Abundant, reliable baseload. Plentiful natural gas and the Grand Gulf nuclear station provide
always-on power — not weather-dependent generation that needs expensive backup.
No state carbon tax. Mississippi hasn't joined a cap-and-trade scheme, so there's no carbon charge
passed through to ratepayers the way there is in California and the Northeast.
Regulation that lets supply grow. Utilities can build new generation to meet rising demand —
like Entergy Mississippi's first new power plant in 50 years — instead of being blocked by mandates.
16.8¢
Mississippi / kWh
17.4¢
Alabama / kWh
18.8¢
U.S. average / kWh
35.3¢
California / kWh
How we calculate this
We estimate your electricity use from your home's square footage and age,
how you heat, and the month — older homes use more power per square foot, and summer air-conditioning and
winter electric heat push usage above spring and fall. We multiply by Mississippi's average residential price,
then show what the same electricity would cost under other states' prices, so the difference reflects
energy policy, not how much power you use.
Demonstration prototype. Comparison prices are EIA residential averages, latest available (April 2026, preliminary
— Form EIA-861M): U.S. average 18.8¢, Alabama 17.4¢, California 35.3¢ per kWh (Georgia, at 15.4¢,
is now below Mississippi and is shown only in the trend chart). Mississippi's statewide residential average is 16.8¢,
up from 13.4¢ in 2024; on this data it ranks 27th-lowest of the 51 states and D.C. Mississippi's rate is set by the utility serving your ZIP — approximate all-in residential
rates: Entergy Mississippi 16.6¢, Mississippi Power 18.1¢, TVA / north Mississippi 14.8¢,
cooperative/municipal ≈16.3¢ (no ZIP = statewide average 16.8¢). Per-utility splits are approximate, scaled to the
latest statewide EIA average; ZIP-to-utility uses dominant territory by ZIP prefix, so a few areas may differ.
Subsidized-supply counterfactual (illustrative). The toggle and "road to higher bills" model the kind of
policy stack high-cost states impose, totaling roughly 5¢/kWh on top of the cost of power: a
subsidized-supply mandate ≈2.0¢, ratepayer subsidies ≈1.0¢, program &
surcharge fees ≈0.8¢, and a reliability premium ≈1.2¢ from forcing reliable plants offline faster than
replacements come online. These are rounded, illustrative figures meant to show direction and order of
magnitude, not a forecast; California's full 35.3¢ rate also reflects high labor, wildfire and transmission
costs beyond mandates. Mississippi today carries only a small "state energy programs" component (≈0.3¢) and
no subsidy scheme.
Usage is modeled from square footage (≈4.4 kWh/sq ft/yr for a gas-heated Deep South home, which runs heavy
summer air-conditioning), a vintage factor (EIA RECS: older homes use ~25% more per sq ft), a seasonal curve,
heating type, and any electric vehicles (≈300 kWh/month each). Generation mix: 2024–25 EIA state profile.
Sources: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Mississippi Public Service Commission, utility tariff filings.