CompareMyPower.com

Your Mississippi
energy advantage.

Mississippi enjoys some of the most affordable, reliable power in America — one of our greatest economic assets. See what that advantage is worth to you today, and what it would cost to lose it to California-style mandates.

Tell us about your home

Mississippi today Subsidized mandates
Flip the switch to layer subsidized-supply mandates onto your bill Subsidized supply, ratepayer subsidies, program fees, and the cost of forcing out reliable power — whatever the source
Your estimated electricity bill in Mississippi
$0
about $0 a year
Your Mississippi bill across the year — tap a month

What's in your bill today?

In Mississippi, almost every dollar on your electric bill buys actual electricity — generation and delivery. There's no subsidy scheme forcing politically-favored power onto the grid, and no stack of program surcharges riding along. That's the difference between a state that lets the market deliver power and one that legislates it. Here's roughly how your July bill splits.

Policy and surcharges add up to just $0 a year of your bill — a fraction of what high-mandate states pile on.

Mississippi vs. the high-cost states

The bottom line. If your home drew the same power under California's energy prices, you'd pay $0 more a month — that's $0 a year out of your pocket. Mississippi's low, reliable rates are a direct result of not following their playbook.

Mississippi vs. the rest of America

-0%
below the U.S. average
18.8¢
U.S. average / kWh
16.8¢
Mississippi / kWh
2.1×
what California charges
Average residential price — Mississippi vs. U.S. average

Mississippi has stayed below the national average every single year — and that advantage is one of our greatest economic assets, pulling jobs and investment here. As national demand surges and other states push their prices higher, keeping our power cheap and reliable takes the right policy choices. The gap is the advantage — and the goal is to maintain it.

The road to higher bills

High-cost states didn't get expensive by accident. They legislated it — subsidies, mandates, and forced retirements of reliable plants, each one added to the bill. Here's what the same monthly bill looks like as you travel that road:

Why it matters. Every step away from market-based, reliable power is a step toward the bills families pay in California and the Northeast. Mississippi's advantage isn't luck — it's policy restraint, and it can be legislated away one subsidy at a time. Adopting a full subsidized-supply mandate stack could cost a typical household $0 a year.

Cheap power is how Mississippi wins

Data centers, factories and manufacturers shop for one thing above all: abundant, affordable, reliable electricity. PJM-region states in the Northeast are watching prices soar as demand outruns mandate-constrained supply. Mississippi can win that investment — if it protects what makes it attractive.

Follow the subsidy playbook

Your bill
Jobs

Pile on subsidies and mandates, force out reliable plants, and Mississippi's rates climb toward the high-cost states — while the energy-hungry employers it could have attracted go elsewhere.

Protect the advantage

Your bill
Jobs

Keep power cheap and reliable, welcome new generation, and let the market build supply to meet demand. Low bills stay low and Mississippi lands the data centers, factories and jobs that need them.

The principle is simple: affordable, reliable energy is an economic asset. The fastest way to throw it away is to copy the policies of the states families are leaving.

The data-center boom — welcome it without raising your bill

AI and data centers are driving the fastest jump in power demand in decades — U.S. data-center use was about 4% of all electricity in 2024 and is expected to more than double by 2030 (IEA). Mississippi is already winning that investment: Amazon alone is putting up to $25 billion into data centers across the state. The real question is who pays for the new power — Entergy Mississippi is building an estimated $2–3 billion of new generation to serve them.

Socialize the cost

The regulated utility builds the new plants and lines for the data centers, then spreads the cost — and the risk of stranded assets — across every ratepayer. Your household bill rises to power someone else's server farm. It's how Georgia's families ended up paying for Plant Vogtle.

Let it pay its own way

A private producer serves the data center under contract — on its own grid, separate from the public system, carrying its own cost and risk. Mississippi still lands the investment, and your bill is untouched.

The same principle, twice. Whether it's a subsidy scheme or a data-center build-out, the free-market answer is the same: don't socialize the cost — let new supply stand on its own. Opening the door to private, consumer-regulated producers lets Mississippi welcome the boom without loading it onto households. Policy idea: “Consumer-Regulated Electricity” — see the Cato Institute briefing paper (Fisher & Lyons) and the ALEC model bill.

Where Mississippi's electricity comes from

Mississippi runs mostly on natural gas (74%) and nuclear (15%) — abundant, dependable, always-on power. There's no mandate dictating which sources utilities must use, so they build what keeps the lights on at the lowest cost. The result is on your bill.
How does that compare to the high-cost states?

Same home, same power use — here's each state's price. The expensive states didn't run out of cheap options; they legislated against them.

Why Mississippi stays affordable

16.8¢
Mississippi / kWh
17.4¢
Alabama / kWh
18.8¢
U.S. average / kWh
35.3¢
California / kWh

How we calculate this

We estimate your electricity use from your home's square footage and age, how you heat, and the month — older homes use more power per square foot, and summer air-conditioning and winter electric heat push usage above spring and fall. We multiply by Mississippi's average residential price, then show what the same electricity would cost under other states' prices, so the difference reflects energy policy, not how much power you use.

Demonstration prototype. Comparison prices are EIA residential averages, latest available (April 2026, preliminary — Form EIA-861M): U.S. average 18.8¢, Alabama 17.4¢, California 35.3¢ per kWh (Georgia, at 15.4¢, is now below Mississippi and is shown only in the trend chart). Mississippi's statewide residential average is 16.8¢, up from 13.4¢ in 2024; on this data it ranks 27th-lowest of the 51 states and D.C. Mississippi's rate is set by the utility serving your ZIP — approximate all-in residential rates: Entergy Mississippi 16.6¢, Mississippi Power 18.1¢, TVA / north Mississippi 14.8¢, cooperative/municipal ≈16.3¢ (no ZIP = statewide average 16.8¢). Per-utility splits are approximate, scaled to the latest statewide EIA average; ZIP-to-utility uses dominant territory by ZIP prefix, so a few areas may differ.

Subsidized-supply counterfactual (illustrative). The toggle and "road to higher bills" model the kind of policy stack high-cost states impose, totaling roughly 5¢/kWh on top of the cost of power: a subsidized-supply mandate ≈2.0¢, ratepayer subsidies ≈1.0¢, program & surcharge fees ≈0.8¢, and a reliability premium ≈1.2¢ from forcing reliable plants offline faster than replacements come online. These are rounded, illustrative figures meant to show direction and order of magnitude, not a forecast; California's full 35.3¢ rate also reflects high labor, wildfire and transmission costs beyond mandates. Mississippi today carries only a small "state energy programs" component (≈0.3¢) and no subsidy scheme.

Usage is modeled from square footage (≈4.4 kWh/sq ft/yr for a gas-heated Deep South home, which runs heavy summer air-conditioning), a vintage factor (EIA RECS: older homes use ~25% more per sq ft), a seasonal curve, heating type, and any electric vehicles (≈300 kWh/month each). Generation mix: 2024–25 EIA state profile. Sources: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Mississippi Public Service Commission, utility tariff filings.